In the writing life, you can describe yourself as a Plotter or a Pantzer.
Plotters plot. No one is sure what Pantzers do. They write by the “seat of their pants” and they never quite know where they are going. In reality, it’s a continuum. I find myself closer to the Pantzer end of the continuum.
Recently a friend asked me to describe how I write. Do I start with a character, a setting, an inciting incident? What do I start with?
I thought about it. I hadn’t thought about it in a long time. I used to think about it a lot but I don’t so much anymore.
I remember the day I started my very first book. I had finished my first Creative Writing course and I wanted to write a novel. I had this binder full of notes. I had tabs for the characters and the setting and the story parts. Both of my sons were at school. Everything else was done. I had a couple of free uninterrupted hours.
In the Creative Writing course, we had done a lot of free fall and I had several two-page scenarios started. None of them seemed like they could become novels. They were simply ideas, simmering on the back burner.
I ignored them and developed the binder, with the tabs – thinking this was how I could start a story. I told myself I would start this story in the two quiet hours I had.
Everything was ready: the binder, my nice hot cup of coffee, me. I took a stack of blank pages and my pen. And I opened the binder.
Then I closed it, and I started writing something completely different. It had no plan, no tabs, no charts to fill out. It did have parts of one of the discarded simmering ideas from the back burner.
The story evolved. Every day, or every other day, I looked forward to writing. I could hardly wait to see what would happen next. Writing consisted of typing some nonsense while I waited for some decent words to show up. Bits of dialogue hit the page. Snatches of setting. Pieces of narrative.
I typed, or wrote by hand until my brain was empty. Then I went over what I had, smoothed it out, deleted a lot. Often dialogue ended up with a different character.
There is much advice that says not to do this. Not to edit as you go. But I edit until it’s perfect. Then I cut and paste that section of story into the Final Draft and it becomes Reality.
The words are now Written in Stone. Yes, the words can change slightly, but the events that have happened cannot UN-happen. They have happened. If I paint myself into a corner, I cannot go back and change Reality.
I know writers who can do this. They have a plot evolving and it’s not working so they change Reality. That would drive me crazy. I would not be able to know which world was real. I could not keep track of all the different possible realities.
So if I do paint myself into a corner, and it happens, a lot, I need to set the whole thing to simmer again on the back burner. It may take weeks before I get an inkling of what will happen next.
I use that time to write other things, like short stories or greeting cards. Or I garden. Or I clean the house. I’m not recommending this. I’m just saying this is what works for me. If you can plot ahead of time and that works for you, good for you. I wish I could do that.
I did finish that first story but it took a long time. So, back then, I decided to create a binder, which I called my Build A Book binder. My plan was to record my process so I would not have to reinvent it each time I wrote a book. I wanted to record my process so I could easily repeat it. Without the struggle.
With each book I wrote and finished, the binder grew with character questionnaires, conflict charts, diagrams of relationships.
But I never used the charts or diagrams.
I did start keeping a list of scenes: time of day, POV character, the goal conflict disaster in each scene. I still do this. But I fill it in AFTER it has been written. I can’t fill it in ahead of time. It would be like I was making up the story.
For some books, I created a collage of images. I’ve used collages three times so far, and each time, I’ve created it about the 75% point. I think it did help me reach the end of the story. But only because it let me see everything that had happened to that point – all at once – in a poster size picture. I still never know the ending until I get there.
One piece of structure that is valuable to me is the age-old Story Structure of Beginning, Middle, End. I know somewhere in my head that at 25% the story will turn 180 degrees, the First Turning Point. At 50% I know I will be at the Point of No Return, where the characters can never go back to who they were at the start, but they are not who they will be by the end. I know that the next turning point will be at 75% where it seems like everything that was working is no longer working.
But I don’t know what those points are UNTIL they have happened. I wish I could plan or plot them. But I can’t.
My third book began as an exercise with a writers group. We all were going to write from a predetermined premise: hero carjacks heroine with a gun.
I finished that story, but it didn’t work. I could not make the foundation/premise work. Everything I built on top of that foundation I liked, but since I had not started with a solid foundation, what I built on top never held up.
When I wrote THE GHOST AND CHRISTIE MCFEE, I had to put the story in a world created by the Bandit Creek Collective. I had no idea where to start. As usual.
After the June 2011 AGM, when Bandit Creek was born, our leader Tawny Stokes wanted us to add our particulars to the chart on the Yahoo Loop. So I did.
I choose the August 1, 2012 publication slot and put my genre as Sweet Contemporary Romance. Tawny also had a column for Title. THE GHOST AND CHRISTIE MCFEE popped into my head. I don’t know where it came from. And at the time, it was Sarah, not Christie, and Christie would morph through various versions of Krista, Christa, Christy, until she became Christie. This is the first time I have started a story with just a title.
I was working on a different story at the time so I kept working on it, letting my title simmer on the back burner. From September to December, I wrote my current WIP and I edited other Bandit Creek stories and that helped me to immerse myself in Bandit Creek.
Two stories caught my attention. The first was Amy Jo Fleming’s DEATH AT BANDIT CREEK. I loved a secondary character, Annie Hamilton, a young schoolteacher turned prostitute. I wondered how that had happened. I wondered what Annie’s mother thought about this. Did Annie’s mother even know what had happened to her daughter?
The second story was Sheila Seabrook’s WEDDING FEVER, a story about diving for the legendary treasure in Lost Lake.
By December I still didn’t have any words written for my Bandit Creek story so I thought I’d better start. If only I knew how to start. All I had was the title and noise in my head.
What was surfacing was Amy Jo’s story (a historical mystery) and Sheila’s story (a contemporary romantic comedy). In between writing a different story, and getting ready for Christmas, I started re-reading my PADI Open Water book. (PADI is the Professional Association of Diving Instructors.)
In January, I still had not started my story, so I began researching fish that might be found in a Montana Lake. That also got tossed in the pot on the back burner to simmer.
At some point, I saw Charlie at the Dive Shack. I’m not sure if he started out as my character or Sheila’s character. He just was, and IS, this person who lives in Bandit Creek. He’s a secondary character in the story.
Maybe I start with secondary characters?
Then I saw a young man walk out of the Dive Shack and head down to the beach. And I saw a young woman drive up in a rental car. And I wondered who they were so I had to write the story to find out.
So what works for me? How do I start a story?
I’m still not sure. I AM sure that a predetermined premise does NOT work. But other than that, I know that if I take a few ideas and set them to simmer on the back burner for a few days (or weeks or months) something will rise to the surface and somewhere there will be a beginning. Then I will find the first few words and paragraphs and pages, and I will set them in stone. And I will gradually move from there.
Does any chart, formula or template work for you? How do you get started on a story?
(photo from photos.com #86546842)
I too am a Pantser… if I plot the book out in advance, it feels like it is already written and my mind takes a hike to the next great idea. So I pick a rough direction and see where the characters take me. Usually it work, but I confess to having a whole folder full of dis-functional ideas.
Loved the post!
I’m a panster, too — my drafts are really messy. I feel at times like I should put up a sign: Story is geologically unstable. May shift at any moment.
I start out with wanting to write a project. I write a bunch of words on the page until they start to take shape into an idea. Then I write a synopsis of sorts, and then revise it, and then revise it until I start to feel like I can start. Then I ignore the synopsis completely and just start writing. I think with my fingers.
Once I finish with the first draft, I do a very fast pass over the story. It’s not really editing, but just to get rid of the junk that found it’s way into the story that I won’t need. Removing the junk makes it easier for me to figure out how to revise the story because the junk’s not in the way, distracting me. The hard work comes in the revision, where I shuffle, rearrange, and fill in things.
Linda Adams – Soldier, Storyteller http://garridon.wordpress.com/
Katie – keep that folder of so-called disfunctional ideas – you may be surprised by one of them!
geologically unstable! That’s good!
I know what you mean about “thinking with your fingers”. There is something magic about that.
I’m way over on the plotter side of that continuum! I’m working on a diamond laundering story that starts with a dead body in a burned out building. I spent a couple of hours this afternoon drawing a flow chart as if I was the arson investigator, asking myself which came first, the body or the building being burned? Which leads to ‘was it Planned or Accidental?’…. I end up with a scene outline that I use to write my first draft. Then I chuck the outline. The next two drafts are driven by the story itself and the process has been known to completely change the ending and a myriad of elements in between! But basically, two drafts later I’m done!
I love the Flow Chart!
Parts of what you do sound suspiciously pantzer – like the unknown endings. Perhaps you are hopping around the continuum…
I love reading about how others write, Suzanne. Your way is really Panster and I’m somewhere between you and Brenda. I come up with an idea that MUST be written, so I write. Somewhere along the way, I have to stop and do some plotting, then back to the writing, meanwhile toss out everything I plotted, and just keep going. LOL
BTW, you came up with Charlie’s Dive Shack, then told me about it so I could use it in my story. 🙂
Sheila – we need a term for the plotter-pantzer hybrid. Or not. In the end, it doesn’t matter how we write the stories. It only matters that we do write them.
Glad to know I invented Charlie. Once they become characters, they just seem real and I forget where they came from.
I just write every story differently. I have tried story boarding, and I have tried plotting an outline. Death at Bandit Creek was definitely plotted with an outline, not that I stuck to it and in revisions I had to go back and add more scenes to make the ending less rushed.
The story I am working on now, The Refugee has been different from every other one. I have a few characters and a premise, what would happen if your husband who has been missing for six years, reappears married to someone else. And then the new wife is murdered?
I have been working away, scene by scene, planning each scene as I do it. Just recently the end has come to me but I am only about 1/3 of the way through the book.
Hi Amy Jo – I’m looking forward to reading that book!
You sound like a “quilter”. You can create scenes out of order, move them around, create new scenes as needed. Not everyone can do that.